I wrote this article when I was 33, and I, who did not understand anything in physics, but who had logical thinking, were outraged by those alogisms and paradoxes that flowed from Einstein’s logic of relativity theory.
But it was criticism at the level of emotions.
Now, when I began to think a little bit in physics, and when I discovered the law of the difference of gravitational potentials, and based on it I built a five-dimensional frame of reference, it is now possible to prove the inaccuracy of Einstein’s theory of relativity at the level of physical laws.
If a ray of light is passed through a glass prism, then we get a set of multicolored rays.
And it is these rays that are what we call the daylight or sunlight.
Thus, light is a set of multi-colored photons. And the photon itself is a quantum of one or another color.
The body of an atom is composed of gravitons. Moreover, all gravitons are polarized north-south to the center of the atom. And the electron, jumping from graviton to graviton, retains its north-south polarization, where the electron has the top - the north, and the bottom - the south. Electrons have such spatial configuration both in the body of the atom and in the electromagnetic wave. Electrons in the electron-positron current, which propagates in the ether adjacent to the conductor, have the same spatial configuration, as evidenced by Faraday’s experiment, set two hundred years ago, which modern physicists knew but forgot.
Strictly speaking, it is not the electrons that rotate around the nucleus of the atom, but their energy in the form of photons, which jump from one graviton to a neighboring graviton.
Историческая наука в СССР. НОВЫЕ КНИГИ
По страницам зарубежных журналов. РЕЦЕНЗИИ НА СОВЕТСКИЕ ИЗДАНИЯ
И. Ф. ИОВВА. Передовая Россия и общественно-политическое движение в Молдавии (первая половина XIX в.). Кишинев. Штиинца. 1986. 261 с.v
КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ СОВЕТСКИХ И РУМЫНСКИХ ИСТОРИКОВ
Рецензии. В. И. ДАНИЛОВ. ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ БОРЬБА В ТУРЦИИ. 50-Е-НАЧАЛО 80-Х ГОДОВ XX В. (ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРТИИ И АРМИЯ)
Рецензии. В. М. ХЕВРОЛИНА. РЕВОЛЮЦИОННО-ДЕМОКРАТИЧЕСКАЯ МЫСЛЬ О ВНЕШНЕЙ ПОЛИТИКЕ РОССИИ И МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЯХ. КОНЕЦ 60-х - НАЧАЛО 80-х ГОДОВ XIX в.
"КРУГЛЫЙ СТОЛ": ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ИСТОРИИ ВЕЛИКОГО ОКТЯБРЯ. ИТОГИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ
ЯНВАРСКИЙ (1987 г.) ПЛЕНУМ ЦК КПСС И ИСТОРИЧЕСКАЯ НАУКА
Историческая наука за рубежом. По страницам зарубежных журналов. РЕЦЕНЗИИ НА СОВЕТСКИЕ ИЗДАНИЯ
А. Н. ЧИСТОЗВОНОВ. ГЕНЕЗИС КАПИТАЛИЗМА: ПРОБЛЕМЫ МЕТОДОЛОГИИ
